Subject	All of them, although Powertrix versions are better
Posted by	TriniTT on September 16, 2014 at 4:06 PM
	This message has been viewed 236 times.
In Reply To	Is that common to all "midori-style" arms or something posted by Inzane on September 16, 2014 at 03:50 PM
Message	than most in that they have offset arm widths for the z32 so there isn't any undue binding on them. Most midoris have even widths(designed for S- and R-chassis), causing binding when installed on the Z32. The main issue is that the factory arms utilize bushings that not only allow rotation around a single axis, but also some flex/give around a second axis. Installing a solid bearing where a bushing should be curbs the proper suspension travel path by eliminating the second axis travel. Cheers, JBrobst
Follow Ups	SPL FUCA Future Plans??? - DennisW [Houston] 15:16:06 09/15/14 Forgive the crappy grammar... - DennisW [Houston] 15:19:24 09/15/14 gktech are making an alternative : ) (n/m) - JaffaUK 16:18:07 09/15/14 different level quality wise though (n/m) - lidz 21:38:59 09/15/14 TBH, it seems like SPL has moved on to more modern chassis - BlackholeZ 19:54:43 09/15/14 Development has stalled on this project after the head - sfarrah 09:48:03 09/16/14 What's wrong with Powertrix FUCAs? (n/m) - Inzane 13:33:44 09/16/14 They don't allow proper suspension travel. - TriniTT 15:26:07 09/16/14 Is that common to all "midori-style" arms or something - Inzane 15:50:21 09/16/14 All of them, although Powertrix versions are better - TriniTT 16:06:57 09/16/14 The 2nd axis you speak of - ZXRider 18:27:56 09/16/14 The first axis is the obvious axis around which the arm - TriniTT 06:35:12 09/17/14 unique autosports sells a pivoting FUCA - aliaZ 17:45:04 09/16/14 Funny that you mention that - ZXRider 18:29:48 09/16/14
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.